Seminars in Vascular Surgery
Volume 24, Issue 2 , Pages 63-71, June 2011

Brachial-Basilic Autogenous Access

  • Tze-Woei Tan, MD
  • ,
  • Alik Farber, MD

      Affiliations

    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress reprint requests to Alik Farber, Section of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Boston University Medical Center, 88 East Newton Street, Collamore Building 5th Floor, Boston, MA 02119-2393

Section of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Boston University Medical Center, Boston, MA

The emphasis on autogenous arteriovenous hemodialysis access has increased the focus on the brachial-basilic autogenous configuration currently recommended by the national guidelines when the cephalic vein is not suitable. The brachial-basilic autogenous access has been extensively studied and compared with both prosthetic (arteriovenous graft [AVG]) and other autogenous accesses. The literature suggests that the brachial-basilic autogenous access is superior to AVGs in terms of patency, reintervention rates, and infectious complications. However, controversy still remains with respect to its role in the treatment algorithm and the technical conduct of the operation. This review will address the ongoing issues and controversies surrounding the brachial-basilic autogenous access and define its role for the hemodialysis access surgeon.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0895-7967(11)00013-5

doi:10.1053/j.semvascsurg.2011.05.004

Seminars in Vascular Surgery
Volume 24, Issue 2 , Pages 63-71, June 2011